Daily Digest: PdF '08 Roundup -- Crickets Seem to Greet "McCain is Aware of the Internet" Meme
By Nancy Scola, 06/25/2008 - 12:06pm

Yep, in both Monday and Tuesday's conference-coverage digests we promised that today we would be returning to our standard digest format. But we're going to do a round-up of coverance-related news today and return to the regular digest tomorrow. Probably.

  • The exchange between former John Edwards campaign blogger Tracy Russo and John McCain's online advisor Mark Soohoo about Mark's candidate's grasp of technology, including Mark's remark that "John McCain is aware of the Internet," was picked up widely -- aided, no doubt, by the fact that video of the back-and-forth was quickly posted online. But here's a question: where's the defense of the Republican candidate's fitness for office from the online right? Mark's comment was said with a sense of disbelief at the premise of Tracy's question, but as the catchy line quickly becomes a campaign '08 meme the response of McCain backers seems to be nearly non-exisitant. As a U.S. senator, McCain served for several years at the head of a powerful congressional committee with jurisdiction over many tech issues -- making him a point person on issues related to the Internet, the world of technology (of both the high and low varieties), and the ever-evolving networked world. But the most spirited defense we've seen so far seems to be Danny Glover's argument on the Next Right that the Internet is nothing more than a communications tool that an American president doesn't need to be bothered with. Otherwise, crickets...

  • Wonkette explains the flow of information that followed Soohoo's "John McCain is aware..." comments at PdF '08: "[Y]ou can only imagine the giggles from the techie crowd, all of whom immediately Twitter the quote to their pet gerbils." That would hurt more if it weren't more or less true.

In fact, we're going to go out on a limb and argue that PdF '08 might be the most mediated -- videod, Twittered, blogged -- conference in all of recorded history. Some evidence in favor:

In Other News...

The first ever presidential Twitter tech policy debate -- featuring Republican National Committee communications director @LizMair on behalf of the McCain campaign vs. Obama tech advisor @mikenelson and moderated by @anamariecox -- has wrapped, and here's one view of the proceedings.

BusinessWeek has a glowing profile of Blue State Digital, the progressive tech shop that grew out of the Dean campaign and is now powering Barack Obama's online strategy. From the article, "Campaign insiders suggest privately that Blue State has so impressed Obama that, if he wins in November, the company could be in the unique position to play a role inside the White House." In other web vendor news, Republican TechPres contributors Mindy Finn and Patrick Ruffini have joined forces under banner of Engage.

Next Steps in Electronic Democracy

I'm excited by all that I read here. I didn't attend the conference, but I've been involved involved in electronic democracy efforts since the mid-1990s. To me, the next step in creating a new democracy online is to build online structures that mirror real-life civic and political structures, but in ways that are flexible,  fluid, intuitive and understandable enough to encourage participation AND accountability.

That means:

  • every NEIGHBORHOOD with an online forum or email list, a Facebook directory, and neighborhood-based bloggers.
  • civic and party activists and precinct workers who electronically identify their allies in each neighborhood, meet face-to-face, listen to each other, discuss and debate and mobilize on local , statewide and national issues, are aware of who in the neighborhood needs a nudge to vote in primary and general elections. These cyber-precinct workers or ward-healers are tied into online databases like the Voter Activation Network (VAN), and work together on letter-writing campaigns, get out the vote efforts, and other forums of civic activism and engagement. Alliances are fluid: two people who may be in the same political party and who work together on a national political campaign may take opposite positions on local issues, and vice versa. Two people who may take diametrically opposed positions on national political issues may agree passionately on local issues. That is the essence of democracy and why civility and mutual respect must rule. 
  • these neighborhood-based online groups tie into city and county-wide online communities, which in turn tie into statewide multi-user blogs that are managed by journalists and seek to be a fair  representation of opinion in the state.
  • the city and county-wide online communities in turn link to, tie in to and have representatives of a plethora of national political campaigns and civic organizations and networks, so that a citizen can enter the online democracy at any point in the loose-knit structure and begin to engage on the local, statewide or national level.
  • Inevitably, citizens will find that their voice is heard most easily at the most local level. Online as well as off, government and civic entities are most likely to be most responsive on the local level.

Building electronic democracy is about civic engagement. It is not a partisan exercise, though the political parties and advocacy groups that best build and utilize online networks and structures and PARTICIPATE will probably have the most success off line, in the real world.

My Consulting Practice: www.jimbuie.com
My Blog: www.jimbuie.net

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Technology and the Internet are changing democracy in America. Personal Democracy Forum is a hub for the exciting conversation underway between political professionals, technologists, and anyone else invigorated by the remarkable potential of technology to engage citizens in the democratic process.



Navigation

© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |
The layout, use of images, color, and other qualities.
How well is does the site carry the message of the candidate?
How the site discusses the issues and how it uses language.
How easy is it to get involved in the campaign?
How well does the site utitlize blogs, video, podcasts, discussion boards, and other technologies?
The ease of navigation and the quality of interactivtity.