Daily Digest: "Loud Anomaly" or Dem Base?
By Nancy Scola, 07/15/2008 - 11:42am

The Web on the Candidates

The Candidates on the Web

  • Newsweek's Andrew Romano, for one, couldn't care less if John McCain can use "a Google" or not. The four-term senator's "computer illiteracy," argues Andrew, "doesn't reflect a lack of curiosity -- it reflects a lack of necessity."

  • Wall Street Journal: "Latino Bloggers React To Candidates’ Outreach Efforts." You're busy, so I'll summarize: the Latino community is hardly homogeneous, and reactions are mixed!

  • The Huffington Post's Amanda Michel asks an excellent question: why the different press reactions to Mayhill Fowler's gotcha moments with Barack Obama and Bill Clinton and Jesse Jackson's hot mic ("I want to cut his...") oopsie on Fox? Amanda calls the disparate ways the incidents were handled "the basic psychology of hypocrisy."

TechCongress and Beyond

  • Future Majority's Kevin Bondelli's is quite "riled up" over House Republican Policy Committee chairman Thad McCotter's sarcastically commie-flavored video on the Twitter Dome Scandal. Perhaps most irksome to Kevin: the pro-soc-net video -- posted on an account less than a week old -- spells YouTube as "UTube."

  • Social networking is reshaping charitable giving. One reason? It seems to hold true for both politics and panda-bear protection efforts -- people are more likely to respond to friends and acquaintances than to professional fundraisers.

  • Threadless loves democracy! But it doesn't <3 partisanship, so if you are going to enter the community-driven t-shirt company's latest design contest, make your t-shirt neither red nor blue.

Technology and the Internet are changing democracy in America. Personal Democracy Forum is a hub for the exciting conversation underway between political professionals, technologists, and anyone else invigorated by the remarkable potential of technology to engage citizens in the democratic process.



Navigation

© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |
The layout, use of images, color, and other qualities.
How well is does the site carry the message of the candidate?
How the site discusses the issues and how it uses language.
How easy is it to get involved in the campaign?
How well does the site utitlize blogs, video, podcasts, discussion boards, and other technologies?
The ease of navigation and the quality of interactivtity.