Phil Noble of PoliticsOnline just handed Joe Trippi $100 cash up on the plenary panel of the IPDI "Politics Online" conference, as instant affirmation of Joe's longstanding argument that someday soon a candidate for President is going to go on the Internet and issue a call to millions of Americans to run a campaign financed solely by small donations of no more than $100. The gesture got a big laugh from the crowd, and for good reason.
Yesterday, I met with my old boss and friend Ellen Miller, who is now deputy director at the Campaign for America's Future, but prior to that, before founding Public Campaign (where we worked together) was the founder of the Center for Responsive Politics, the country's leading tracker of money in politics. Back in 1992, she helped convince Jerry Brown to voluntarily limit his presidential campaign contributions to $100, using the cutting-edge technology of an 800-number as his fundraising vehicle.
People forget how the other campaigns and the bigfoot journalists who manufacture the conventional wisdom sneered at Brown's 800-number--and even tried to prevent him from mentioning it during televised candidate debates. But by the end of Campaign 1992, every candidate had an 800-number, and Brown raised over $8 million in small donations, enabling him to keep running even after the other Democratic contenders dropped out of the race.
Ellen and I talked about Trippi's notion of the $100 candidate in 2008, and agreed that his, or her, day is finally upon us. Just think of all the groups with email lists of over 100,000, and imagine a candidate convincing, say, 50,000 people to donate $100 to a campaign that is explicitly free of dependence on wealthy special interest donors. (Call it "people financing" instead of "public financing.") Listening to the other panelists responding to Trippi's idea, it's clear that not everyone yet gets it. Ellen Malcolm, who ran America Coming Together, and is back at EMILY's List, just said that she thinks Americans may want something other than a candidate who relies on small donations, such as someone who connects with them and who they agree with on issues. And Rick White, now with TechNet, speculated that Trippi's notion might attract kooks like Lyndon LaRouche.
Comments
I think the expectation is a bit off the mark
I don't think that person will be either an incumbent or a candidate.
I believe that person will be none other than Ms. Oprah Winfrey. She will do for political fundiraising what she did for publishing with her Book Club recommendations.
She has officially endorsed Barak Obama and is hinting at doing so with other people across the country. If anybody can pull off that kind of fundraising, it is certainly Ms. O.
=================================
Writer and Publisher
www.lizasabater.com
www.culturekitchen.com
www.dailygotham.com
Micah-- exactly. Thank you fo
Micah-- exactly. Thank you for reminding the people with short political memories about Jerry Brown, who 12 years ago was the first $100 candidate. So that day was upon us, not is. This is like at blogging confabs when Dave Winer says "someday the media and politicians will start reading blogs!" Duh.
Whatever is the problem with the $2000 limit? Hey, Alan Solomont and Laurie David are citizens, too.
Now when people say "special interests" they often mean PAC money. John Kerry's PAC intake was $141K George Bush's was $2m -- these were less than <1%. But someone would be a fool-- sorry, someone posing as a political populist-- to suggest that "special interests" are going to disappear overnight.
Following the money in this case ignores the more fundamental needs.
I want a candidate whose organization responds to every request/question that is asked (online). And this can either be done by (A) central committee and core staff (B) far-flung volunteers or (C) accountable, hierarchical staff/volunteer structure. Traditionally we've been at (A), and with some of the 2004 campaigns we might have seen (B), but I think ultimately the future is at (C).
100 revolution
See my post about why we ought to think about the primary selection process more broadly:
http://www.politicalmammal.com/blog/2005/3/15/joe-trippis-100-dollar-rev...
politicalmammal